Analisis Pendekatan Rules of Reason dalam Kasus Praktik Predatory Pricing (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 03/KPPU-L/2020)

Vincentius Eric Sutanto

Abstract


The practice of predatory pricing is the act of a business actor to get rid of or hinder a competitor’s business in the relevant market share by selling at a loss or setting a very low price. Conch South Kalimantan Cement Limited Company was reported on suspicion of predatory pricing practice. The allegation report is based on Article 20 of Indonesian Law Number 5 of 1999. In the formulation of the article, the rules of reason approach are used. In the rules of reason approach, even if a business actor is proven to have practiced predatory pricing, it is still possible to be declared innocent. This is because in the rules of reason approach, Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha first looks for the predatory pricing that cause anti-competition in market shares or not. As long as it does not cause anti-competition and supports business competition, Conch South Kalimantan Cement Limited Company cannot be sanctioned and found not guilty. Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha after using rules of reason approach finally stated Conch South Kalimantan Cement predatory pricing practice cause anti-competition and give it sanction.

Keywords


Antitrust law; rules of reason approach

Full Text:

PDF

References


Febrina, Rezmia, “Dampak Kegiatan Jual Rugi (Predatory Pricing) Yang Dilakukan Pelaku Usaha Dalam Perspektif Persaingan Usaha”, Jurnal Selat, Volume 4, Nomor 2, Mei 2017.

Fitri, Fitri dan Sri Jaya Lesmana, “Indikasi Predatory Pricing Pada Praktik Flash Sale Pelaku Usaha E-Commerce Dalam Perspektif Hukum Persaingan Usaha”, Jurnal Supremasi Hukum, Volume 17, Nomor 2, 2021.

Hotana, Melisa Setiawan, “Industri E-Commerce Dalam Menciptakan Pasar Yang Kompetitif Berdasarkan Hukum Persaingan Usaha”, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, Volume 1, Nomor 1, Agustus 2018.

Kagramanto, L. Budi, Mengenal Hukum Persaingan Usaha, Surabaya: Laros, 2015.

Mahmuda, Siti, “Prinsip Per se Illegal dan Rule of Reason Secara Alternatik Dalam Penetapan Harga Industri Jasa Freight Container (Uang Tambang)”, Jurnal Jurist-Diction, Volume 4, Nomor 2, Maret 2021.

Nugroho, Susanti Adi, Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia: Dalam Teori dan Praktik Serta Penerapan Hukumnya, Kencana: Jakarta, 2014.

Permatasari, Ratna Maya, “Analisis Yuridis Konsep Perjanjian Dalam Hukum Persaingan Usaha”, Jurnal Yuridis, Volume 7, Nomor 2, Desember 2020.

Panjaitan. Yohanna Ameilya, “Indikasi Predatory Pricing Pada Praktik Perang Harga Antara Pelaku Usaha Financial Technology (Fintech) Ditinjau Berdasarkan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia”, Jurnal Dharmasisya, Volume 1, Nomor 3, September 2021.

Rato, Dominikus, Pengantar Filsafat Hukum, Yogyakarta: LaksBang PRESSindo, 2017.

Soekanto, Soerjono dan Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2012.

Supianto, “Pendekatan Per Se Illegal dan Rule Of Reason Dalam Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia”, Jurnal Rechtens, Volume 2, Nomor 1, Juni 2013.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v7i1.1001

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Wajah Hukum Published by Faculty of Law, Batanghari University
Adress: Fakultas Hukum, Jl.Slamet Ryadi, Broni-Jambi, Kec.Telanaipura, Kodepos: 36122, email: wajahhukum.unbari@gmail.com


Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.