Perbandingan Bentuk Kelembagaan Program Penjaminan Polis Asuransi Antara Indonesia dengan United Kingdom dan Jepang
Abstract
Insurance company defaults in Indonesia have a negative impact on policyholders. Suing the company for bankruptcy is the last resort for policyholders to obtain compensation from the company's assets, but the enforcement of court judgements is difficult due to obstacles such as abuse of receivership powers. Policyholders' rights are often violated as they do not receive insurance claim payments. Law No. 40 of 2014 requires insurance companies to participate in the Policy Guarantee Programme and establish a Policy Guarantee Agency within two years. However, such an institution has not yet been established in Indonesia. This research compares the Policy Guarantee Programmes in the UK and Japan to show the importance of establishing a similar institution to protect the rights of policyholders. This research uses normative research with a comparative approach and legislation. By studying the sustainability of the Financial Services Compensation Scheme in the UK and the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation in Japan, the research recommends that the Indonesian government promptly establishes a Policy Guarantee Corporation, either as an independent institution or in conjunction with the existing Deposit Insurance Corporation for the banking sector.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agustin, Aria Sri, A. M Hasan Ali, and Elviza Fauzia. “Tinjauan Yuridis Pembentukan Lembaga Jaminan Polis Asuransi Di Indonesia.” Journal of Legal Research POSKOLEGNAS 2, No. 1 (2020)
Alfi, M, E Susilowati, and S Mahmudah. “Kewenangan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Dalam Perkara Kepailitan Perusahaan Asuransi.” Diponegoro Law Journal 6, No. 1 (2017)
Dewi, Ni Putu Sintha Tjiri Pradnya, and Desak Putu Dewi Kasih. “Pengaturan Lembaga Penjamin Polis Pada Perusahaan Asuransi Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana 9, No. 4 (2020)
Hidayati, Putri Nurul. “Bentuk Kelembagaan Program Penjaminan Polis Di Indonesia (Studi Perbandingan Antara Indonesia Dengan Malaysia Dan Korea Selatan).” Jurnal Dharmasisya 1, No. 3 (2021)
Husain, Fajrin. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Polis Asuransi Menurut UU No.40 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perasuransian,.” Lex Crimen 5, No. 6 (2016)
Jayadi, Hendri. “Fungsi Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan Dalam Hukum Perbankan Indonesia.” Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum 4, No. 2 (2018)
Panjaitan, Boas P., Ismail, and Dewi Iryani. “Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum Program Penjaminan Polis Untuk Melindungi Pemegang Polis Asuransi.” SETARA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, No. 1 (2022)
Setiawati, Neneng Sri. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Polis Asuransi Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Klaim Asuransi.” Jurnal Spektrum Hukum Fakultas Hukum Untag Semarang 15, No. 1 (2018)
Widiawati, Wahyuni, and Permono. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Polis Perusahaan Asuransi Yang Pailit Berdasarkan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.” Zaaken Journal of Civil And Bussiness Law Universitas Jambi 1, No. 1 (2020)
Widywati, Niken. “Urgensi Pembentukan Lembaga Penjamin Polis Sebagai Penjamin Hak Nasabah Asuransi Dalam Kepailitan Pada Perusahaan Asuransi.” Jurnal Hukum 2, No. 5 (2019)
Winata, I. Nyoman. “Analisis Rasio Keuangan Untuk Menilai Kesehatan Perusahaan Asuransi Jiwa Nasional.” Premium Insurance Business Journal 8, No. 2 (2021)
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v8i1.1404
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Wajah Hukum Published by Faculty of Law, Batanghari University |
