Kedudukan Hukum Harta Bersama Setelah Dinyatakan Pailit Akibat Tindakan Actio Pauliana (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 211 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2019)

Raden Ayu Farah Diva Adiputri, Parulian Paidi Aritonang

Abstract


Actio pauliana is a legal remedy provided by law to annul the actions of a debtor that may harm creditors in the process of bankruptcy. One form of debtor actions that obstruct the fulfillment of creditors’ rights is found in the Supreme Court Decision No. 211 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2019, which involves an unlawful act committed by the wife a mortgage to settle her debt. Based on this issue, the author conducts research to determine the legal position of join assets after being declared bankrupt duet o actio pauliana. The purpose of this research is to understand the legal standing of joint assets after bankruptcy is declared duet o actio pauliana and how bankruptcy law resolves joint assets issues as reflected in the decision under study. The research findings show that the actio pauliana action is the appropriate step to annul the unlawful transfer of property under the law, which is then returned to the bankruptcy estate to esnurethe fair fulfillment of creditors’ rights. The property involved in the transation must be returned to the trustee for the management and settlement of the bankruptcy estate. Additionally, the legal status of join assets resultig from actio pauliana must be borne by both the husbang and wife as long as they remain married, because during the marriage, both spouses share the responsibility for the payment obligations.


Keywords


Actio, Pauliana, Joint, Assets, Bankruptcy.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buku

Eyta Ras Ginting, Hukum Kepailitan Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit. Jakarta:Sinar Grafika, 2019.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada, 2010.

Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003.

Siti Anisah, Perlindungan Kepentingan Kreditor dan Debitor dalam Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia. Total Media, Yogyakarta, 2008.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata

Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan.

Putusan Nomor 208/PK/Pdt.Sus/2012.

Putusan Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015 tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan.

Putusan Nomor 211 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2019.

Tesis

Palupi, Trisiwi Cintya. “Analisis Yuridis Akibat Hukum Actio Pauliana dalam Kepailitan Terhadap boedel Pailit (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 212 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2019)”, Tesis Fakultas Hukum. Surakarta : Universitas Negeri Surakarta, 2023).

Kevin Wibowo, “Analisa Actio Pauliana pada Perseroan Terbatas (PT) yang telah Diputus Pailit (Study Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 529 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2017)”, Tesis Fakultas Hukum. Surabaya : Universitas Narotama, 2021).

Jurnal

Dharma, A. Aryadi I Gusti Ngurah. “Actio Pauliana sebagai Jaminan Hukum Kreditur dalam Proses Kepailitan,” Kertha Negara, Vol. 7, No. 12, (2019).

Kristanto, A. dan L. Tedjosaputro. “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Harta Bersama yang dijaminkan Tanpa Persetujuan Suami “, Jurnal Juristic, Vol. 1, No. 01, (2020).

Maharani, Cendikia Aurelie. “Akta Penegasan Perjanian Perkawinan Kaitannta dengan Pemenuhan Prinsip Publisitas,” Jurnal Notaire, Vol 4, No. 2, (2021).

Butarbutar, Elisabeth Nurhaini. “Pembuktian terhadap Perbuatan Debitur yang Meruikan Kreditur dalam Tuntutan Actio Pauliana”, Jurnal Yudisial, Vol. 12, No. 2. (2019).

Ramadhany, Ifa, Toto Tohir dan Rimba Supriatna, “Kekuatan Pembuktian Pengakuan sebagai Alat Bukti pada perkara Perdata di Pengadlan Negeri Bandung dihubungkan dengan Asas Sederhana, Cepat, Biaya Ringan (Studi Putusan Nomor 431/Pdt. G/2019/Pn. Bdg)”, Jurnal Prosiding Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 7, No. 2, (2021).

Yuniartha, Monika. “Eksistensi Harta Bersama dalam Harta Pailit terkait dengan Tindakan Actio Pauliana yang diajukan oleh Kurator”, Jurnal Gagasan Hukum, Vol. 4, No. 2, (2020).

Sebayang, Siddik Meliasta. “Akibat Hukum Kepailitan Suami terhadap Harta Bersama Menurut Undang-Undang Kepailitan (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 057. PK/Pdt. Sus/2010)”. De Lega Lata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 2, No. 2, (2017).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v9i1.1746

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Wajah Hukum Published by Faculty of Law, Batanghari University
Adress: Fakultas Hukum, Jl.Slamet Ryadi, Broni-Jambi, Kec.Telanaipura, Kodepos: 36122, email: wajahhukum.unbari@gmail.com


Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.