Eksistensi Surat Izin Pemeriksaan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Sebagai Objek Sengketa Administratif

Rafiqah Rana, Sri Laksmi Anindita

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the legal status of the examination approval letter issued by the Notary Honorary Council (MKN) as a State Administrative Decision (KTUN) and to evaluate the procedural compliance of the notary’s summons based on Supreme Court Reconsideration Decision No. 36 PK/TUN/2020. Using a normative juridical approach and case study method, the study finds that the letter meets the criteria of a KTUN and can be subject to an administrative lawsuit. However, the Supreme Court rejected objections regarding procedural violations due to the notary's attendance at the examination. The study concludes that government administrative law is more appropriate for assessing the validity of such administrative actions, emphasizing the principles of effectiveness and protection of individual rights. These findings highlight the importance of procedural understanding for notaries and the need for adequate legal assistance when facing administrative actions.

Keywords


KTUN, MKN, Notary, Procedure, Law

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buku

Asikin, Z. Perlindungan Profesi dalam Perspektif Hukum. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2019.

Asshiddiqie, J. Pengantar Hukum Tata Negara dan Administrasi. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2020.

Budianto, K. dan M. Sadi. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Prenada Media. 2024.

Gunawan Widjaja. Etika Profesi Notaris. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2020.

Habib Adjie. Hukum Notaris Indonesia: Tafsir Tematik Terhadap UU No. 2 Tahun 2014. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2018.

Kusroh, L., Handayani, Y., & Saraya, S. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Semarang: PT Arr Rad Pratama, 2024.

Muhammad, M. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2021.

Ramadhan, S. Buku Ajar Hukum Administrasi Negara. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2023.

Jurnal

Arbani, M. “Sistem Sanksi Dalam Pelanggaran Kumulatif Pelaksanaan Jabatan Notaris Dan Eksekusi Sanksi Yang Bersifat Kondemnator (Studi Kasus Putusan Majelis Pengawas Wilayah Notaris Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Nomor 09/Pts/Mj,PWN,DIY/XI/2018)”, Indonesian Notary, Vol. 2, No. 4, (2020) : 370-391.

Athira, Amira Budi dan Siti Hajati Hoesin, “Eksistensi dan Peran Lembaga Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Dalam Memberikan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Notaris (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung No, 20 PK/Pid/2020)”, PALAR (Pakuan Law Review), Vol. 6, No. 2, (2023): 1-15.

Bomhoff, J. “Making legal knowledge work: Practising proportionality in the German Repetitorium”, Social dan Legal Studies, Vol. 32, No. 1, (2023): 3-24

Duniewska, Z. Proportionality Principle in Administrative Law as a Condition of Legality of Restriction of the Rights of the Individual”, Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne, Vol. 1, No. 24, (2022): 13-28.

Harseptian dan Shara, “Fungsi Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Dalam Memberikan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Yang Tersangkut Kasus Pidana”, Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, Vol. 8, No. 2, (2023) : 352-365.

Juleni, J. dan Sudarwanto, A. S, “Challenges on Obtaining Legal Protection Through Notary Honorary Council for The Notary Presumed to Commit Crime”, International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, Vol. 51, No. 2, (2018): 1-10.

Jurrens, J. “Standardizing Judicial Review of Procedural and Substantive Agency Errors”, Administrative Law Review Accord, Vol. 6, No. 4, (2021): 1-14.

“Proportionality balancing and constitutional governance: A comparison and theoretical reconciliation”, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 15, No. 4, (2017): 866-892.

Sesung, R. dan Mayasari, “Ethics of the Notary Profession and Challenges in the Digital Era”, Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), Vol. 4, No. 3, (2021): 1234-1245.

Sibarani, “Pengawasan Majelis Pengawas Daerah Terhadap Notaris di Kabupaten Sintang Menurut Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris”, Jurnal Nestor Magister Hukum, Vol. 3, No. 3, (2020) : 135-145.

Sodiq, Moh. “Peranan dan Wewenang Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara”, Supremasi Hukum, Vol. 7, No. 1, (2018):1-15.

Sumiarti, dkk, “Fungsi Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Ditinjau Dalam Perspektif Perlindungan Jabatan Notaris dan Kepentingan Umum”, PALAR (Pakuan Law Review), Vol. 5, No. 1, (2023): 1-15.

Syukri, W. “Diskresi Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia Dalam Menunjang Tugas dan Fungsi Majelis Pengawas Notaris dan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris”, Journal Law of Deli Sumatera, Vol. 1, No. 1, (2021): 1-10.

Utomo, Hatta Isnaini Wahyu, dkk, “The Position of Honorary Council of Notary in Coaching Indonesian Notaries”, Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, Vol 92, (2019): 112-118.

Widiada, M. dkk, “Eksistensi Majelis Kehormatan Notaris dalam Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Notaris”, Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 4, No. 3, (2019):1-17.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris.

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris.

Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2021 tentang Tugas dan Fungsi, Syarat dan Tata Cara Pengangkatan dan Pemberhentian, Struktur Organisasi, Tata Kerja, dan Anggaran Majelis Kehormatan Notaris.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v9i2.1867

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Wajah Hukum Published by Faculty of Law, Batanghari University
Adress: Fakultas Hukum, Jl.Slamet Ryadi, Broni-Jambi, Kec.Telanaipura, Kodepos: 36122, email: wajahhukum.unbari@gmail.com

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.