Kewenangan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan dan Pembangunan (BPKP) Melakukan Audit Investigasi Guna Menentukan Kerugian Keuangan Negara
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to identify and understand and analyze in depth the authority of the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency in conducting investigative audits. The problems raised in this study discuss the authority of the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency in conducting investigative audits and what are the Implications of the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency's Investigation Audit on State Financial Losses in Law Enforcement. This study uses a normative method with the steps of description, systematization and explanation of the contents of positive law in depth using a concept approach, a law approach and a case approach using a systematic synchronization analysis. The results showed that the feedback from the investigative audit enabled the realization of financial management and supervision reforms including the integration between activity planning and budgeting. Thus, fiscal transparency and accountability are very urgent in reforming the management and supervision of state finances, because transparency and accountability in managing state finances can reduce state losses. As the government's internal auditor, the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency is authorized to supervise finance and development. On the other hand, the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency has the authority to conduct investigative audits to determine whether or not there has been a loss in state finances at the request of law enforcement. The implications of the investigative audit carried out by the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency in addition to imposing an obligation on financial managers to return state financial losses based on the results of the investigative audit, the results of the investigative audit also have consequences in the law enforcement process, because the results of the investigative audit are in the form of documents and information provided by auditors in court can affect the judge's confidence in the examination of the trial in court.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Buku
Abdul Hakim, Reformasi Penglolaan dan Pertanggungjawaban Keuangan Daerah. Fakultas Ekonomi UGM, Yogyakarta, 2006.
Abdul Halim Dan Icuk Rangga Buwono, Pengelolaan Keuangan Negara-Daerah: Hukum, Kerugian Negara Dan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan, UPP STIM YKPN, Yogyakarta, 2011.
Achmad Djuaeni Kadmasasmita, Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara: Konsep dan Aplikasi, STIA LAN Jakarta, 2012.
Ady Kusnadi, Aspek Hukum Pengawasan Dalam Pelaksanaan Keuangan dan Daerah, Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Departemen Kehakiman dan Hak Asasi Manusia, Jakarta, 2000.
Arifm P Soeria Atmadja, Keuangan Publik Dalam Perspektif Hukum Teori, Kritik Dan Praktik, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2009.
Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan, Keuangan Negara dan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan, Sekretariat Jendral Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan, Jakarta, 2000.
Brian Binder, Pengelolaan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah, UI Press, Jakarta, 2009.
Dasril Munir, Kebijakan dan Manajemen Keuangan Daerah. Yayasan Pembaruan Adminstrasi Publik Indonesia (YPAPI), Yogyakarta, 2004.
Gunawan Widjaya, Seri Keuangan Publik; Pengelolaan Harta Kekayaan Negara ' Suatu Tujuan Yuridis, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2008.
Hadari Nawawi, Pengawasan Melekat dilingkungan Aparatur Pemerintahan, Erlangga, Jakarta, 2002.
Hendra Karianga, Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah, PT Alumni, Bandung, 2011.
Muhammad Djafar Saidi, Hukum Keuangan Negara, PT RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2011.
Nick Devas, at.all, Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia, UI Press, Depok, 2001.
Soekarwo, Hukum Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah Berdasarkan Prinsip-Prinsip Good Financial Governance, Airlangga University Press, Surabaya, 2005.
Sukrisno Agoes, Auditing: Petunjuk Praktis Pemeriksaan Akuntan Oleh Akuntan Publik, Edisi 4-Buku 2, Salemba Empat, 2013.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan:
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Kitab Undang-¬Undang Hukum Pidana.
Undang- Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2003 Tentang Keuangan Negara.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2004 tentang Perbendaharaan Negara.
Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2006 Tentang Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan.
Keputusan Presiden Nomor 105 Tahun 2001 jo. Peraturan Presiden Nomor 64 Tahun 2005 tentang Susunan Organisasi lembaga pemerintah Non Depatemen.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v6i1.292
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Wajah Hukum Published by Faculty of Law, Batanghari University |
