Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Bagi Pelaku Tenaga Pendidik Dalam Melakukan Kejahatan Pencabulan terhadap Anak (Studi Putusan Nomor 75/PID.SUS/2020/PN Metro)
Abstract
Fornication embodies the kufr one comes from sexual tyranny which results from the existence of deformations that give birth to a part in the figure of our audience. Fornication is a form of cruelty that plays very sluggishly, especially in the face of the victim, especially if the victim is a child because the child is the future successor or can be called the successor of the nation because sexual immorality will violate human rights and can damage human dignity, especially for the soul, reason and descendants. The problem in this research is what factors influence the criminal act of child molestation and how the accountability is based on Decision Number 75 / Pid.Sus / 2020 / PN Metro. The research method using this research journal is a normative juridical approach and an empirical approach. Based on the results of the research, the factors causing the perpetrator to commit the crime of sexual immorality against this child include religious factors where the faith of the defendant is shaky and tempted by worldly temptations. the occurrence of sexual immorality.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Buku
Adami Chazawi. 2002, SH. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian I.Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Adami Chazawi. 2010. Kejahatan Terhadap Tubuh dan Nyawa. Rajawali Pers. Jakarta.
Agus Rusianto. 2015. Tindak Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Tinjauan Kritis Melalui Konsistensi antara Asas, Teori, dan Penerapannya. Surabaya. Kencana.
Ahmad Nindra Ferry. 2002. Efektifitas Sanksi Pidana Dalam Penanggulan Kejahatan. Psikotropika. Kota Makassar. Perpustakaan Unhas. Makassar.
Andi Hamzah. 2009. Terminologi Hukum Pidana. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.
Bambang Waluyo. 2000. Pidana dan Pemidanaan. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.
Bambang Waluyo. 2000. Pidana dan Pemidanaan. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.
Maidin Gultom.2008 Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia.Refika Aditama Bandung.
Mahrus Ali. 2011. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.
M. Nasir Djamil.2013.Anak Bukan Untuk Dihukum. Sinar Grafika,
Moeljatno.2008. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.
Moeljatno. 2008. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.
Moeljatno. 2005. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. Bina Aksara. Jakarta.
Muladi dan Dwidja Priyatno. 2009. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana koorporasi. Kencana Media Group. Bandung.
R.Soersono. 1992. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Sinar Grafika. Bandung.
Suteki. 2013. Desain Hukum di Ruang Sosial.Thafa Media. Yogyakarta.
Wirjono Projodikoro. 2003. Tindak Pidana Tertentu di Indonesia. Refika Aditama. Bandung.
Waluyadi.2009. Hukum Perlindungan Anak. CV Mandar Maju. Bandung.
Perundang-Undangan Dan Peraturan Lain
R. Soesilo. 1989. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Bogor: Politeia
Sumber Lain
Dwi Nanda Saputra, SH. MH ( Kasipidun ), Wawancara, Metro 06 Januari 2021
Rakhmad Fajeri, S.H., M.H. (Majelis Hakim), Wawancara, Metro 27 Desember 2020
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v5i1.373
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Wajah Hukum Published by Faculty of Law, Batanghari University |


