Telaah Yuridis terhadap Pengaturan Restorative Justice di Kepolisian
Abstract
Police institutions are the first and main gate in law enforcement efforts. First, the police institution in charge of carrying out each criminal case’s enforcement, then the next stage will be determined by the police. The practice of law enforcement so far tends to be retributive justice, so that only a few cases can be resolved in the police investigation process. Restorative justice appears by offering various advantages, including a simple settlement process, involving both parties, both perpetrators and victims, and the role of a third party to mediate, so that cases can be resolved according to the agreement. The police, as the first institution in the law enforcement process, had already issued regulations regarding the application of restorative justice, as a form of law enforcement efforts to change retributive law enforcement. The purpose of this research judicially examined the regulation of restorative justice at the police investigation phase in line with the enactment of the regulation of the Chief of Police Number: SE/8/VII/2018 concerning the Application of Restorative Justice in the Settlement of Criminal Cases and the Regulation of the Chief of the Indonesian Police Number 6 of 2019 concerning Criminal Investigation. This research used a qualitative research method with the type of normative legal research through a statutory approach
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aditama, Ryan dan Yolanda, Novia, “Penerapan Restorative Justice pada Peradilan Pidana Anak Terkait Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia”, Jurnal Wajah Hukum Volume 4 (2), (Oktober 2020): Hlm 491
Kristian& Christine Tanuwijaya, “Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Dengan Konsep Keadilan Restoratif (Restorative Justice) Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu Di Indonesia”, Jurnal Mimbar Justitia Vol. I No. 02 (Edisi Juli-Desember2015): Hlm 593.
Laksana, Andri Winjaya, “Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak”, Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, Volume IV No. 1 (Januari - April 2017): Hlm 62. Doi: Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.26532/Jph.V4i1.1644
Meliala, Nefa Claudia,“Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif: Upaya Melibatkan Partisipasi Korban Dan Pelaku Secara Langsung Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana”, Veritas Et Justitia, Volume 1 Nomor 1, (2015): Hlm 120. Doi Https://Doi.Org/10.25123/Vej.1419
Poeloengan, Andrea H, dkk, Mediasi dalam Fungsi Pengawasan Polri, Jakarta: Kompolnas, 2017.
Rochaeti, Nur, “Implementasi Keadilan Restoratif Dan Pluralisme Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia”, Masalah-Masalah Hukum Volume 44 Nomor 2, (2015): Hlm 153. Doi: 10.14710/Mmh.44.2.2015.150-160
S. Sahabudin, “Karakteristik Hukum Otonom dan Implikasinya di Indonesia (Model Penegakan Hukum Prosedural Pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana)”, Wajah Hukum, Volume 1 Nomor 1, (Oktober 2017): Hlm 116.
Siregar, Nella Octaviany, “Plea Bargaining dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Beberapa Negara”, Jurnal Wajah Hukum, 3 (1) (2019): hlm 1-9.
Yulia, Rena, “Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Putusan Hakim:Upaya Penyelesaian Konflik Melalui Sistem Peradilan Pidana”, Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 5 No. 2 (Agustus 2012) : Hlm 234.
Yulia, Rena, Viktimologi Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Kejahatan, Edisi 2, Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2021.
Zulfa, Eva Achjani, Pergeseran Paradigma Pemidanaan, Bandung: Lubuk Agung, 2011.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v5i2.716
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Wajah Hukum Published by Faculty of Law, Batanghari University |
