Analisis Alternatif Restruturisasi Utang Atau Penutupan Perusahaan Pada Pandemi Covid-19 Melalui Pkpu, Kepailitan dan Likuidasi
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic situation has caused the destruction of economies throughout the world, including Indonesia. The negligence of the debtor due to the COVID-19 pandemic can be used as a reason to apply for a postponement of debt obligations. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic which disrupts the financial stability of the debtor, so that the debtor cannot pay off his debt or is negligent to the creditor, he can apply for a suspension of debt payment obligations. On the basis of the covid-19 pandemic, that the impossibility of carrying out the contract in the form of financial incapacity. UUK & PKPU provide legal protection to debtors in the midst of the covid-19 pandemic so they don't fall into bankruptcy through PKPU as stipulated in article 222 of the UUK & PKPU. The type of research used is normative legal research. The practice of paying debts through applications for postponement of debt payment obligations (PKPU) based on Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, which starts from the procedure for submitting a PKPU application, temporary PKPU, publication of PKPU decisions, receipt of invoices, making a list of temporary receivables, implementation of the reconciliation meeting for the preparation of a list of permanent receivables, a discussion meeting on the reconciliation plan which includes restructuring of offers to creditors related to the reconciliation plan. The postponement of debt payment obligations (PKPU) is not enough to provide an opportunity for debtors with good intentions to carry on their business. Because the peace process is determined by the creditor, the UUK & PKPU require a reconciliation process with the approval of the creditor. The rules of Article 229 UUK & PKPU give full power to creditors, this causes debtors to depend on the decisions of creditors.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Buku
Edward Manik, Cara Mudah Memahami Proses Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Jakarta: Mandar Maju, 2013
H.S. Salim, Hukum Kontrak, Teori dan Teknik Penyusunan Kontrak, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2006
Kartono, Kepailitan dan Penundaan Pembayaran, Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 2014
Man. S. Sastrawidjaja, Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Bandung: Alumni, 2016
Munir Fuady, Hukum Pailit dalam Teori dan Praktek, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2002
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2009
Soerjono Soekanto, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 1998
Subekti, Pokok-pokok Hukum Perdata, Jakarta: Intermasa, 2005
Sutan Remy Siahdeini, Sejarah, Asas dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan Memahami Undang-Undang No.37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Jakarta: Penerbit Prenadamedia Group Divisi Kencana, 2018
Suyatno, R.A., Pemanfaatan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang: Sebagai Upaya Mencegah Kepailitan. Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2012
Tjiptono Darmadji, Restrukturisasi: Memulihkan dan Mengakselerasi Ekonomi Nasional, Jakarta: Grasindo, 2001
Viktor M. Situmorang dan Hendri Soekarso, Pengantar Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 1993
Jurnal
Agri Chairunisa Isradjuaningtias, Force Majeure (Overmacht) Dalam Hukum Kontrak Indonesia, Jurnal Universitas Parahyangan. Vol. 1, 2015
Arbijoto, Tinjauan Kritis Terhadap Hukum Kepailitan, Jurnal Hukum Prioris, Vol.2, No.3, 2009
Biner Sihotang, Restrukturisasi Sebagai Penyelamatan Kredit Bermasalah Pada Bank, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pakar: Sosial Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 1 tahun 2019
Catur Irianto, Penerapan Asas Kelangsungan Usaha Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU), Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 4 No.3 tahun 2015
Edwin Ronaldo, Pengaruh Intermediasi Perbankan terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Indonesia, Jurnal : Tirtayasa Ekonomika Vol. 12, No. 1 April 2017
Hasdi Hariyadi, Restrukturisasi Utang sebagai Pencegahan Kepailitan, Sign Jurnal Hukum: Vol. 1, No.2, Maret 2020
Julaiddin, Julaiddin & Sari, H. P., Kebijakan Hukum Di Tengah Penanganan Wabah Corona Virus Disease (Covid-19). Jurnal UNES Law Review, 4(4), tahun 2020
Lindryani Sjofjan, “Prinsip Kehati-Hatian (Prudential Banking Principle) Dalam Pembiayaan Syariah Sebagai Upaya Menjaga Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Syariah”, Jurnal Pakuan Law Review. Vol. 1 No.2 Juli-Desember 2015
Pramudita, S.A., Kartikasari & Cahyadini, A., Kedudukan Hukum Menkominfo Dalam Pelaksanaan Perdamaian Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Standing, 4(1) tahun 2020
Respatia, W & Fidiana, F, Kebijakan Restrukturasi Utang Melalui Debt to Equity Swap. Jurnal Ekuitas 14(1) tahun 2010
Sunarmi, R. Harianto, D. & Azwar, T. K. D, Konsep Utang dalam Hukum Kepailitan Dikaitkan dengan Pembuktian Sederhana (Studi Putusan No: 04/PDT.SUS.PAILIT/2015/PN.NIAGA.JKT/PST), USU Law Journal, 4(4), 2016
Tauratiya, Overmacht: Analisis Yuridis Penundaan Pelaksanaan Prestasi Akibat Pandemi Covid-19, Jurnal Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan Vol. 7, No. 1, 2020
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v6i2.1082
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Wajah Hukum Published by Faculty of Law, Batanghari University |


