Urgensi Reformulasi Penegakan Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Ringan dalam Perspektif Keadilan Restoratif di Indonesia

Nurhani Mouriska, Saiful Anam

Abstract


The enforcement of law concerning minor criminal offenses in Indonesia remains predominantly oriented toward formal procedural mechanisms that prioritize punitive sanctions as the primary means of case resolution. This approach generates several systemic challenges, including lengthy judicial processes, relatively high administrative costs, disproportionate sentencing in relation to the severity of the offense, and the increasing burden on courts and correctional institutions. Such conditions reflect inefficiencies within the criminal justice system and indicate the limited integration of victim-oriented recovery mechanisms. Contemporary criminal law theory, however, has shifted toward a restorative justice paradigm emphasizing restitution, dialogue between offenders and victims, and active community participation in conflict resolution. This study aims to examine the urgency of reformulating law enforcement policies on minor offenses from a restorative justice perspective in order to establish a more effective, proportional, and equitable criminal justice system. The research employs a normative juridical approach through literature review, statutory analysis, and examination of prior scholarly works. The findings reveal that although existing regulations provide space for restorative justice, its implementation remains fragmented and lacks national policy integration. Therefore, regulatory harmonization, the development of integrated operational guidelines, and institutional capacity building for law enforcement officials are essential to reposition restorative justice as the primary paradigm in handling minor criminal cases. Such reformulation is expected to enhance systemic efficiency, strengthen public trust in the legal system, and promote substantive justice centered on restoration.

Keywords


Effectiveness, Regulatory Harmonization, Restorative Justice.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adiningsih, Yufiyandini, dan Gialdah Tapiansari Batubara. “The Paradox of Implementing Restorative Justice at the Investigation Stage: A Systematic Weakening of Sentence Enhancement for Repeat Offenders”. SIGn Jurnal Hukum 7, no. 2 (2025): 627–646. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i2.496.

Andriyani, L., M. M. Gunawan, dan R. R. M. Manitra. “Restorative Justice in Criminal Cases in Indonesia: The Urgency of Reinterpretation and Concept for Reform”. Indonesian Journal of Crime and Criminal Justice 2, no. 1 (2026): 154–195. https://doi.org/10.62264/ijccj.v2i1.167.

Asa, A. I., Syamsuddin, dan dkk. “Restorative Justice Is A Progressive Breakthrough In Resolving Criminal Law Problems”. IJLR: International Journal of Law Reconstruction 9, no. 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v9i1.41804.

Azhari, I Wayan Sukardiawan, I Gede Wiradana, Mukhtar, Muslimin, dan Syamsuddin. “Restorative Justice-Based Criminal Law Policy Reformulation: A Comparative Study of Implementation in ASEAN Countries”. Lex Journal: Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan 9, no. 3 (2025): 663–681. https://doi.org/10.25139/lex.v9i3.10821.

Fadila, Yolanda, dan dkk. “Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ringan Melalui Restorative Justice Sebagai Bentuk Upaya Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Dalam Perspektif Keadilan”. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research 4, no. 1 (2024): 4756–65. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i1.8425.

Feriandref, C. A., dkk. “Transformasi Tujuan Pemidanaan Di Indonesia: Systematic Literature Review Mengenai Perkembangan Teori, Kebijakan, Dan Implementasi Keadilan Restoratif Di Era Baru Hukum Pidana”. Juris Studia : Jurnal Kajian Hukum 7, no. 1 (2026): 22–34. http://jurnal.bundamediagrup.co.id/.

Hambali, A. R., et al. “From Criminalization To Restoration: Reformulating Narcotic Law Policy With A Restorative Justice Approach In Indonesia”. European Journal Of Law And Political Science 4, no. 5 (2025): 24–32. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejpolitics.2025.4.5.184.

Husnayain, Nazla. “Politik Hukum Terhadap Integrasi Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Praktik Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia”. Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi 13, no. 3 (2025): 1006–1020. https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v13i3.7534.

Jamaludin, Ahmad, dan Dandi Ditia Saputra. “Unifikasi Regulasi Keadilan Restoratif Melalui Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia”. Legal Standing: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 7, no. 2 (2023): 417–435. https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v7i2.7315.

Jzani, M. Rafsan. “The Effectiveness of Restorative Justice in Resolving Criminal Acts: Interaction Between Ocu Customary Law and Positive Law”. Jurnal Ius Constituendum 10, no. 3 (2025): 394–414. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v10i3.12234.

Ma, Mariana D., dan P. Studi Ilmu Hukum. “Reformulation Of Restorative Justice Arragements That Oriented Towards Victim Protection”. Jurnal Pacta Sunt Servanda 6, no. 2 (2025): 145. https://ejournal2.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JPSS.

Muttaqi, Nabila Ihza Nur. “Urgensi Integrasi Pengaturan Restorative Justice dalam RUU KUHAP sebagai Bentuk Reformasi Keadilan”. Lex Renaissance 10, no. 1 (2025): 168–96. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol10.iss1.art7

Nadeak, Cristin Slavina. “Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif (Restorative Justice) dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Ringan”. Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan 13, no. 9 (2025): 121–30. https://doi.org/10.3783/causa.v2i9.2461.

Nashir, Muhammad Alvin, Nabila Maharani, dan Aisyah Zafira. “Urgensi Pembentukan Undang-Undang Restorative Justice Dalam Rangka Reformasi Keadilan Dan Kepastian Hukum Di Indonesia”. Sapientia Et Virtus 9, no. 1 (2024): 344–357. https://doi.org/10.37477/sev.v9i1.501.

Purba, P. R., dan J. Simamora. “Implementasi Kelayakan Penerapan Restorative Justice Oleh Kejaksaan Dalam Kasus Tipikor Dibawah 50 Juta”. Judge: Jurnal Hukum 6, no. 9 (2025): 1071–1080. https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v6i04.1028.

Rahmalillah, A. “Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Kejahatan Kecil Dalam Prespektif Sosiologi Hukum”. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Hukum 4, no. 1 (2026): 1934–1954. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i1.

Riziq, Moh., dan Amri. “A Critical Analysis of Restorative Justice in Indonesia's Criminal Justice System: From Punishment to Restoration”. International Journal of Law Dynamics Review 3, no. 1 (2025): 11–19. https://doi.org/10.62039/ijldr.v3i1.82.

Roychan, W., Susanto, dan Taufikur Rohman. “Reformulasi Pengaturan Restoratif Justice dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia”. Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum 13, no. 2 (2023): 45. https://doi.org/10.55499/dekrit.v13n2.210

Rusydianta, M. “Reformulating Fraud Crimes Under Article 378 Of The Criminal Code Based On Restorative Justice Values”. Prophetic Law Review 3, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.Vol3.Iss2.Art6.

Sukma, Fadjar, dan Chitto Cumbhadrika. “Urgensi Penerapan Rechterlijk Pardon Sebagai Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Dalam Perspektif Keadilan Restoratif”. Gorontalo Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 46. https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v6i1.2678.

Supyanto, Heri, Jemi Lay, dan Carolina Kuntardjo. “Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ringan Terhadap Harta Kekayaan Melalui Keadilan Restoratif Berdasarkan Teori Pencegahan Kejahatan”. Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif 15, no. 2 (2024): 29–40. https://doi.org/10.37477/sev.v9i1.501.

Tanjung, Andry Syafrizal, and Jafan Fifaldi Harahap. “Restorative Justice Regulations in Reforming Criminal Procedure Law”. Daengku: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Innovation 4, no. 1 (2024): 155–161. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.daengku2359.

Utomo, W. M., dkk. “Reformulasi Penanganan Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dengan Kekerasan Dalam Transisi Menuju KUHP Nasional”. Lex Journal: Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan 4, no. 2 (2024): 27–38. http://ejournal.unitomo.ac.id/index.php/hukum.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v10i2.2173

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Wajah Hukum Published by Faculty of Law, Batanghari University
Adress: Fakultas Hukum, Jl.Slamet Ryadi, Broni-Jambi, Kec.Telanaipura, Kodepos: 36122, email: wajahhukum.unbari@gmail.com


Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.