Tinjauan Yuridis Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Akibat Penjualan Pupuk Bersubsidi Palsu
Abstract
The limited availability of subsidized fertilizers sold at official kiosk outlets makes it difficult for some farmers to get them. Not a few farmers who decide to buy subsidized fertilizer in other places whose authenticity is not guaranteed. As a result there are some farmers who are deceived by sellers of fake subsidized fertilizers. Therefore, a legal provision was made to protect the rights of farmers as consumers, and to deter sellers of fake subsidized fertilizers from taking action. Business actors must also be responsible for the consequences of losses suffered by consumers. This study aims to determine the factors causing the sale of counterfeit fertilizers and how the mechanism for resolving consumer disputes due to the sale of counterfeit fertilizers is based on Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. the research method used is normative juridical. The results of the study found that the factors that caused the sale of fake subsidized fertilizers were the lack of caution of consumers in purchasing subsidized fertilizers, the absence of responsibility for business actors, and the ease of obtaining raw materials for making fake fertilizers. Settlement of consumer disputes as legal protection for farmers can be reached through three stages, namely conciliation, mediation, and arbitration.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Buku
Muhammad, Abdulkadir. “Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum”, (Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004
Miru, Ahmadi. “Prinsip - prinsip Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Di Indonesia”, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2013.
Rudy, Dr. Dewa Gde, dkk. “Buku Ajar Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen”, Bali: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana, 2016.
Safudin, Endrik. “Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dan Arbitrase”, Jakarta: Instrans Publicing, 2017.
Pertanian, Kementrian. “Pedoman Pengawasan Pupuk dan Pestisida Tahun 2019”, Direktorat Jenderal Prasarana dan Sarana Pertanian, 2019.
Marwan, M, dan Jimmy P. “Dictionary of Law Complete Edition Reality”, Yogyakarta: Reality Publiher, 2017.
Mamudji, Sri, dkk. “Metode Penelitian dan Penulisan Hukum”, Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2005.
Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.
Jurnal
Mairul dan Kartika Dewi Irianto, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Melalui Jalur Non Litigasi (Studi pada Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) dan Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (LAPS))”, PAGARUYUANG Law Journal, Vol. 1, No. 2, (Januari 2018): P-ISSN: 2580-4227, E-ISSN: 2580-698X.
Mulyadi, Mohamad dan M. Edi Premono. “Pupuk Palsu : Penyebaran, Identifikasi Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Usaha Perkebunan”, https://saraswantifertilizer.com/pupuk-palsu-penyebaran-identifikasi-dan-dampaknya-terhadap-usaha-perkebunan/, PT. Saraswanti Anugerah Makmur – Saraswanti Group, (April 2018).
Rigi Nini, Syahrana Raesi, dan Rafnel Azhari. “Analisis Efektivitas Kebijakan Pupuk Bersubsidi Bagi Petani Di Nagari Cupak Kecamatan Gunung Talang Kabupaten Solok”, JOSETA: Journal Of Socio Economic on Tropical Agriculture, Vol. 1 No. 3, (Desember 2019): 75-83.
Rusli, Tami. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Antara Konsumen Dan Pelaku Usaha Menurut Peraturan Perundang-undangan”, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/324198782.pdf, Keadilan Progresif Vol. 3, No. 1, (Maret 2012).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v5i2.529
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Wajah Hukum Published by Faculty of Law, Batanghari University |


